The Palestinianã¢â‚¬â€œisraeli Conflict a Very Short Introduction by Martin Bunton Book Review
See a Problem?
Thank you for telling us nigh the trouble.
Friend Reviews
Reader Q&A
Community Reviews
"And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you lot free." – John viii:32
I exercise not know nigh "truth" – this is such a loaded word. But it is my firm belief that in studying history, "facts" will indeed free y'all from your misconceptions and prejudices.
Historical books always tend to be coloured by the bias of the writer. I am not talking of outright falsification here; even the most ethical and honest historians tend to interpret facts through the lenses of their ain prejudice. Truthful objec
"And y'all shall know the truth, and the truth shall set y'all free." – John eight:32
I practise not know nigh "truth" – this is such a loaded discussion. Merely it is my firm belief that in studying history, "facts" volition indeed free you from your misconceptions and prejudices.
Historical books always tend to exist coloured by the bias of the author. I am not talking of outright falsification here; even the most upstanding and honest historians tend to translate facts through the lenses of their own prejudice. Truthful objectivity is impossible in practice – unfortunately, this is the human condition. And moreover, this is one of the charms of history books: the point of view of an erudite historian.
Nevertheless, in the history associated with extremely emotional and disputed issues, multiple points of view are sometimes a burden. Hither, we crave to strip abroad the layers of obfuscation and interpretation which has accumulated over the years, and await at the facts in all their stark reality. We demand to remove the flesh from the bones and look at the skeleton beneath.
That is what this slim book does wonderfully. After reading many books and articles from both the Palestinian and Israeli betoken of view over the years, I have finally encounter a book which sets down the facts without embellishment and allows the reader to make his own informed opinions.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Bunton, an acknowledged scholar in Middle Eastern affairs, has divided the fractious and chaotic history of Palestine into six easily digestible chunks, 5 of them covering twenty years each and one covering a decade: a total of 110 years spanning from 1897 to 2007. They start with the concept of Zionism, first mooted as a political philosophy by Theodore Herzl in 1897, and end in 2007 with the nation of Israel standing firm and defiant and Palestine all but decimated.
What I learnt from the book:
1. Zionism as a political has been alive and kicking since 1897. Contrary to what many people believe, State of israel was non created as a refuge for homeless Jewish refugees.
2. The germination of State of israel was aided and abetted by Britain, without taking into consideration the opinions of the indigenous population.(('Zionism, be information technology right or incorrect, good or bad,' [Arthur James Balfour, British Secretarial assistant of State] wrote in 1922, was 'rooted in age-long traditions, in present needs and hereafter hopes of far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land.')
3. Golda Meir's statement that "in that location were no Palestinians" is factually right. Merely what she does not say is that at that place were no Israelis either. There was a region chosen Palestine, which was home to thousands of Arabs, who were forcibly displaced past European settlers supported by the West. And always, the larger clamper of country was given to the minority settlers.
4. At that place were many times when Arabs could have made a tough bargain with Israel. But they were divided among themselves, and the bulk of the Arab nations were not very concerned near Palestinians until recently, when a sort of Pan-Arab consciousness seems to be emerging.
v. Fifty-fifty though a two-state solution has been proposed and in principle accepted by the UN, there is very little take chances of it e'er becoming reality, every bit immigration to Israel keeps on increasing leading to the construction of illegal colonies Palestinian lands. This has pushed the already marginalised Palestinians to the wall, leading to them becoming more and more fierce, which in plow allows Israel to apply asymmetric force.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Bunton did not leap any surprises on me: I was gratified to find that my grasp of the history of the conflict was more or less right. However, the facts and the dates, set down in blackness and white, provided a detailed picture one of the greatest injustices of the twentieth century.
This book taught me that the historical legitimacy of State of israel depends on whether one believes the Bible to be history or mythology.
...more
The British! Ever the fucking British!
***
Very Short Review: A balanced, incisive history of the messy Israel-Palestine conflict.
Read in July 2015
...more
Bunton emphasizes that (seemingly) irreconcilable claims to the aforementioned piece of land--not "aboriginal religious hatreds"--are what li
I similar to retrieve I'm fairly well-informed about the contours of the I-P conflict, but I had never read a book-length recounting of the whole history. This was a good place to start. Information technology'south very short (information technology's office of Oxford Academy Press's "very curt introductions" series), simply hits all the major events and manages to practise so--from what I tin can tell--without oversimplifying.Bunton emphasizes that (seemingly) irreconcilable claims to the same piece of land--not "ancient religious hatreds"--are what lie at the center of the disharmonize. This has been true most from the start, when United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland, in the wake of World State of war I, made inherently incompatible promises--or at least promises that were in serious tension--both to provide for Palestinian self-government and a Jewish homeland in the aforementioned territory.
This volume is, as far as I can tell, extremely even-handed, though Bunton isn't afraid to effect judgments on i side or the other. Unfortunately, it ends on the pessimistic note (which won't shock anyone who's been following the news lately) that a two-land solution may exist farther away than ever. The book also includes a guide to further reading, which makes it fifty-fifty more than valuable as a jumping-off point for understanding the history of the conflict.
...more than
1- Early in the book, while describing the attitude of Israel towards the state allocated to it by the Un, the author describes the borders of Israel as " contested, or fragile". A more accurate description of the borders of Israel would be: illegal. Israel is the only st
I think this book is mostly accurate and constitutes a great effort in summarizing such a complicated history in a short book. I have a problem with some of the wording that the author ( and the world at large) uses. For example:one- Early in the book, while describing the attitude of Israel towards the land allocated to it by the UN, the author describes the borders of Israel as " contested, or fragile". A more accurate description of the borders of State of israel would be: illegal. State of israel is the just land in the globe that I know of whose vague nigh its borders. It is like an amoeba that refuses to commit to its shape on the map, or worse, it is like a cancer that cannot be trusted to comprise itself without expanding and metastasizing. "Fragile/contested" is an understatement.
2- The author's wording is biased towards describing arabs as terrorists and Israeli's every bit Activists. For example, he described Ben-Gurion as taking a "highly activist stance towards Israel and against Palestine, threatening retaliation with an iron fist". But he describes the Arabs every bit being "belligerent" in the Khartoom meeting when they adopted an equally activist stance towards Palestine and against Zionism and refusing negotiations.
3- The author very quickly goes over the description of the so-called panic flight of Palestinians in 1948. The author uses the discussion Palestinians "fled" their homes. It is prudent to use caution when interpreting the word "fled". If the Palestinians fled their homes, information technology is because they were faced with an diff threat that they could not confront. We only hear of people "fleeing" their homes these days in the context of tornadoes or natural disasters where the terrorizing forces are bigger than technology, planning, reason and negotiation. The Palestinians did not willfully seek clearing to better places with more attractive opportunities. Just rather, escaped a natural disaster, systematically carried out by Israeli's to terrify the Palestinians with massacres ( e.g. Deir Yassin Massacre) and and so expelling them from their homes, and bulldozing their homes. Just by observing the palestinian fate it is piece of cake to infer that the terror that led them to flee was biggy. After "fleeing" they were killed in Hashemite kingdom of jordan (1970), in Sabra and Shateela in Lebanon and endured poverty and bigotry wherever they roamed.
four- When commenting on Sabra and Shateela, the writer mentions that the massacre was carried out by the Lebanese, with the "help of protective Israeli' forces" and their nighttime raids. I think this is a identify where the author, once more can use the give-and-take "terrorist attacks" to depict the Israeli actions. Only the unfortunate truth is that the term "terrorist" is limited to describing Arabs and muslims.. Same thing goes for using the term "gorilla" attacks. This is very similar to portraying the Native Americans as an brute population, with no linguistic communication, emotions, and no culture, an endeavor to normalize expelling them from their homes and minimize the crimes against humanity.
five- I dislike the use of the word "independence of Israel" in 1948. Israeli lands were never occupied by anyone other than their rightful Palestinian owners. When Israel was built-in and brought to beingness, the Israeli's could have celebrated "the successful occupation of Palestine and the expulsion of its people", but non State of israel's independence.
6- The author uses the discussion "humiliating" to describe the defeat of Jamal Abdel Nasser against Israel. Nasser fought and was defeated, simply he was proud and not humiliated. I think the only thing that is humiliating nigh that era is the stance the world took against the crimes against palestinian humans.
...more
My second book on the topic this year (the kickoff being A Convenient Hatred: A History of Antisemitism) and a very riveting account of the conflict. Having finished this brusk introduction, I already have in my sights some more opinionated books on the topic such equally Norman Finkelsteins works and Ilan Pappés. However, this does serve as a solid, unbiased standpoint for a reader to springboard off into whatsoever deeper reading they would like to partake in regarding this t
Understanding PalestineMy second volume on the topic this year (the kickoff being A User-friendly Hatred: A History of Antisemitism) and a very riveting account of the conflict. Having finished this curt introduction, I already accept in my sights some more than opinionated books on the topic such as Norman Finkelsteins works and Ilan Pappés. Nonetheless, this does serve as a solid, unbiased standpoint for a reader to springboard off into whatever deeper reading they would like to partake in regarding this topic.
There are some pretty stellar reviews already on here, so I volition go on this short and then as to entice potential readers into opening the pages of this book without putting them off with unnecessary depth (it is only 114 pages long subsequently all).
I appreciated the fact Mr Burton is transparent regarding a few points I hadn't realised earlier.
1. The contempo biblical connotations attached to Israels need to exist is just that. Contempo.
2. Palestinians take been abused by competing powers in the center east throughout the conflict, and fifty-fifty used past their own groups. A truly desperate situation.
iii. If Arab nations had stopped maytring the Palestinians, or using them to accomplish political kudos, so perhaps we would have seen a quicker resolution.
4. Hardliners edifice illegal settlements are going to cause more bloodshed. Catamenia.
Unfortunately, the volume demonstrates that the resolution of the problem is not getting whatever easier.
...more
Overall, it is a skilful starting point to begin your education nigh Palestine-Israel, but don't allow it exist your only education.
...more 
Nevertheless, the topic and the data provided are very worthwhile. The Palestinian–Israeli Conflict is a tangled web, merely there were
This is the third book in the "Very Short Introduction" series, and I have to say, these books, while brusk, seem to brand no attempt to be engaging or interesting in style or tone. They seem to be invariably dry, academic, and textbook-like. While I capeesh the breath that they comprehend in a condensed telescopic, they are far more laborious than they ought to be.However, the topic and the information provided are very worthwhile. The Palestinian–Israeli Conflict is a tangled web, but there were a few things that I was not enlightened of that I learned, particularly near the origins:
(1) "Palestine" never existed independent of the Ottoman empire, which centrolineal with Germany during Earth War I.
(2) Losing WWI was the setting in which Britain (the foot in the door for the rest of the West, including the The states) got involved.
(3) There was a Jewish National Fund eyeing the territory in question as early equally 1901.
Those facts really helped my contextualize the "how did nosotros go here" question, which previously, I had merely been aware of post-WW2 Zionist movements that had been a source of conflict.
Anyhow, it is all still very complicated, just this dry out yet informative book helped clear upwards a few things.
...more After reading the book and advisedly gluing to it pieces of my own knowledge, I arrived at the post-obit view. The Jewish people that entered and occupied the lands of Palestine had left their religious principles at the door. The jewish occupants of the palestine lands, even nether the umbrella of a land past the name of Isreal, are in essence what we typically characterization as terrorists. No other country exists to exlusively house or represent one religion. Isreal is an aggressor and the aggression should neither be tolerated nor aided. The mere beingness of the conflict is a signal of shame and embarrassement for all jewish people and christians too.
...more
Chapter i: Ottoman Palestine 1897-1917
Chapter two:
Chapter 1: Ottoman Palestine 1897-1917
Chapter 2: British Palestime 1917-37
Chapter iii: Palestine partitioned 1937-47
Chapter 4: Atzmaut and Nakba 1947-67
Chapter 5: Occupation 1967-87
Affiliate 6: The rise and fall of the peace process 1987-2007
This is an expanse of history that I have picked upwards over the past xxx odd years almost entirely from journalism and tv, with a couple of films and one (for me seminal) war game.
The book is a concise overview separate into half-dozen chapters roofing the menstruation from 1897 to 2007, clearly explaining how the state of Israel came to exist almost exclusively through immigration from Europe, why the Arabs didn't seize the ch Highly recommended to gain a meliorate understanding of this century old conflict.
This is an area of history that I have picked up over the past xxx odd years well-nigh entirely from journalism and television, with a couple of films and one (for me seminal) war game.
The book is a curtailed overview split into six chapters covering the flow from 1897 to 2007, conspicuously explaining how the country of Israel came to exist almost exclusively through clearing from Europe, why the Arabs didn't seize the chances to create a Palestinian country (with the do good of hindsight) and showing with excellent maps how the state was allocated past Europeans (primarily the British), Un and warfare. Especially interesting was the explanation of how Jewish immigrants initially purchased land in the agriculturally rich valley and coastal areas, rather than in the biblical Israeli areas of Judea and Samaria (broadly, the West Bank), which influenced how extra-national forces considered the country should be partitioned.
As far equally I tin tell, the book appears impartial, noting the arguments for both Israeli and Palestinian, with consequent difficulty of reaching a compromise. ...more
Firstly, I take studied very trivial history and while I learnt nearly WWI in school we did not encompass WWII. So it was actually interesting and enlightening to read about the transition flow. The accounts go chronologically and come up from a variety of walks of life. As some other reviewer said, the fresh feeling of the letters an
I really enjoyed my experience with this book. One of my goals for 2020 was to read more non-fiction, especially history, and this was 1 of my elevation contenders for the year.Firstly, I have studied very little history and while I learnt about WWI in school we did not cover WWII. Then information technology was actually interesting and enlightening to read about the transition menstruum. The accounts get chronologically and come from a variety of walks of life. As some other reviewer said, the fresh feeling of the letters and diary entries kept me very engaged and focused.
I would say that as someone who knows admittedly goose egg about the time menses, I could have washed with reading a few other texts to get a better grasp of the major players of the fourth dimension. A lot of information is packed into this volume, and I am looking forward to re-reading it when I have a better base of operations knowledge.
...more
My only grouse is the language - the writer could have used simpler language, specially since the volume contains extracts from UN & various governments' resolut
What I liked best about the book was the writer's counterbalanced arroyo to & neutral stand on the topic. In add-on to stating the facts - (who, when, where, what), he has also interpreted the why & how of each milestone on this long rocky road, letting the chips fall where they may, without attempting to justify or accept up for either side.My only grouse is the language - the author could have used simpler language, particularly since the book contains extracts from Un & various governments' resolutions that are already cumbersome to read & translate.
Nevertheless, the book is a very proficient starting betoken to begin reading up on this topic.
...more This was a very curt book, and was the first i I read on this subject. It was clear and there was an try to simply lay down the facts, and abstaining from making any judgements. I learnt the major events that have shaped the present of the region.
The volume deals with the origins of the disharmonize, and describes virtually all the major and latest events that have occurred.
At the finish, the author has, like every slap-up instructor, very thoughtfully provided a timeline of the major events. Information technology
This was a very short book, and was the first one I read on this subject. It was clear and there was an effort to simply lay downwards the facts, and abstaining from making whatsoever judgements. I learnt the major events that take shaped the present of the region.
The volume deals with the origins of the conflict, and describes almost all the major and latest events that take occurred.
At the terminate, the author has, like every slap-up instructor, very thoughtfully provided a timeline of the major events. It is very helpful in summarizing the unabridged book.
As to this book, information technology covered what I thought I knew and fleshed out some darker corners. I feel as if I take a better context for the bug (though no resolution here, either.) It makes an important decision to divorce the disharmonize from whatsoever ahistorical/religious discussion, so it picks upward with Zionism and continues to 2012 or so. I recollect that yard
This is the starting time "Very Curt Introduction" I accept read, and I love the concept. Ameliorate than Wikipedia, and not equally much of an investment as a longer tome.As to this book, it covered what I idea I knew and fleshed out some darker corners. I experience equally if I accept a better context for the issues (though no resolution hither, either.) It makes an important decision to divorce the conflict from any ahistorical/religious discussion, then it picks up with Zionism and continues to 2012 or so. I think that makes sense. Worth your fourth dimension!
...more
Non much else to say! A good reference text.
Related Manufactures
Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign y'all in to your Goodreads business relationship.
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/17070375-the-palestinian-israeli-conflict
0 Response to "The Palestinianã¢â‚¬â€œisraeli Conflict a Very Short Introduction by Martin Bunton Book Review"
Post a Comment